The Product
UPDATE: When you are done reading this page, you may wish to read this report about a second test we conducted.
There has been discussion on various barbecue forums recently over the change that Kingsford made to their briquettes. Kingsford says on their website that their new briquettes are "ready faster" and "burns even longer". They apparently attribute the "ready faster" claim to their "Sure Fire Grooves". "More edges and surface area to catch the flame quickly. Grooves provide air channels for fast heating and even burning." Reading the FAQ on their website we find the following claims:
So, those are the claims made by Kingsford. On the other hand there are quite a number of complaints from Kingsford customers about this new briquette burning significantly hotter and not as long as the old briquette. So what's the real scoop? Well, fortunately we still had some of the old Kingsford in our garage left over from our attempts to get wet charcoal to spontaneously ignite. Kingsford probably didn't think we had any, huh? Well, we did, so let's look at the claims made by Kingsford and compare the old Kingsford with the new Kingsford.
New Briquettes Weigh Less?
The Results:
3 pounds of the old briquettes contained 53 briquettes. 3 pounds of the new briquettes contained 52.5 briquettes. When we weighed 7 whole, large briquettes of each type, both samples weight exactly 180 grams. (We switched to grams for this since our scale has slightly better resolution when weighing grams vs. ounces.) And as you can see in the photo, both briquettes are roughly 1.75 inches wide.
Conclusion:
We think Kingsford is confused on this one. The old and new briquettes are the same physical size and the same weight. So, it looks like their claims of equal numbers of briquettes in the old and new bags just isn't true. It looks like the new bags simply contain less charcoal.
New Briquettes Are Easier to Light?
The Results:
Both the old and new briquettes took 3 sheets of newspaper to get the fire started in the chimney starter as far as we were concerned. We really didn't see any difference between the two as far as ease of lighting goes.
Conclusion:
While we couldn't really detect any difference in the ease of lighting the old vs. new briquettes, we're willing to allow that the new ones might be a bit easier to light. Perhaps, we just can't see that small of a difference.
New Briquettes Are Faster To Light?
The Results:
The old briquettes took about 10 minutes in the chimney starter to get to the point where we felt we had a roaring fire and could dump them out into the cooker. The new briquettes were ready to dump out in about 8 minutes.
Conclusion:
Kingsford wins this one. The new briquettes took 2 minutes less to get a roaring fire going in the chimney starter, a 20% improvement over the old briquettes.
New Briquettes Are Ready to Cook Sooner?
The Results:
Once we dumped them into the Weber Smokey Joe cooker, the old briquettes were completely ashed over in 17 minutes, while the new briquettes were completely ashed over in 15 minutes. We congratulate Kingfsford because they said "about 15 minutes" and danged if it wasn't just about 15 minutes!
Conclusion:
Kingsford wins this one also. The new briquettes took 2 minutes less to get ready to cook (completely ashed over), a 12% improvement in the total time from lighting the newspaper to putting meat on the grill. However, keep this 2-minute improvement in mind for later. This is a really interesting number!
New Briquettes Burn Even Longer?
The Results:
Equal weights of the old and new briquettes burned virtually the same length of time. 3 pounds of old briquettes burned for 5 hours, 42 minutes while 3 pounds of the new briquettes burned 5 hours, 39 minutes.
Conclusion:
We think Kingsford gets busted on this one! The difference in burntime between the old and new briquettes was only 3 minutes, less than a 1% difference! And while the error in this testing is probably greater than the difference, wow, isn't it curious that the old briquettes burned just a little bit longer? In any event, this test shows that equal weights of the two briquettes will burn the same time in a cooker where you can control airflow. The old and new briquettes have essentially the same heat content. We'll deal with the case in which you can't completely control airflow in your cooker later on down in the maximum temperature test.
So, just to be clear, the new briquettes and the old briquettes burn the same length of time when you use the same weight. A bag of the new briquettes which contains 10% less charcoal than the old bag will burn for a 10% shorter time.
BONUS: What About Ash Production?
The Results:
3 pounds of the old briquettes produced 850 ml of ash, while the new briquettes produced 875 ml of ash.
Conclusion:
This test only reaffirms that both the old and new briquettes produce an appalling quantity of ash.
New Briquettes Burn Slightly Hotter?
The Results:
The old briquettes were able to achieve a maximum temperature of 765 degrees while the new briquettes were able to achieve a maximum temperature of 900 degrees.
Conclusion:
Busted again! While Kingsford doesn't say on the bag that the new briquettes burn hotter, in their FAQ they say the new briquettes burn slightly hotter. 900 vs. 765 isn't "slightly hotter," it's a lot hotter. (It is interesting to note that about 1/3 of the back of the old bag is devoted to praising the "barbecue secret" of slow cooking. The new bag doesn't mention barbecue or slow cooking, and in fact, spends a large portion of the back discussing grilling meat.) So, based on our results, if you are using a cooker where you don't have good control over airflow, you will see the new briquettes burn hotter and therefore not as long.
New Briquettes Produce the Same Great Smoky Tasting Flavor?
The Results:
We won't claim to be able to do taste testing or smell tasting, but we did note that the two briquettes burn with distinctly different smells.
Conclusion:
You'll have to determine for yourself whether or not these new briquettes produce different tasting food. However, we wonder about the claim of the "same great smoky tasting flavor" when the smoke from the two types of briquettes is so decidedly different.
Conclusion
Here are the results of our testing in tabular format:
It looks like all the complaints on barbecue forums about the new Kingsford burning hotter and therefore not as long are valid. For the sake of getting the briquettes ready to cook a couple of minutes sooner, it looks like Kingsford has sacrificed some of the ability to cook low and slow in many cookers.
UPDATE: When you are done reading this page, you may wish to read this report about a second test we conducted.
|
You can support this website by shopping at The Naked Whiz Website Store and Amazon.com
|